Last materially reviewed: September 21, 2026
Direct answer
Yes, a person targeted by a sexual deepfake or a sexual voice clone in the Philippines has real remedies, even though no deepfake-specific statute had been enacted as of 1 October 2026. Act in this order: get safe if you are being threatened, record where the content is without re-sharing it, report it to the platform for removal, and file with the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group, the NBI Cybercrime Division or the CICC’s 1326 hotline. Sharing sexual photos, voice or video of a person without consent is gender-based online sexual harassment under Section 12 of the Safe Spaces Act. If the person shown is, or is made to look, under 18, the Anti-OSAEC and Anti-CSAEM Act applies.
If you are in danger, or the victim is a child
- Threats, money demands or a partner as the abuser: treat it as a safety problem first. The women and children’s desk at any police station must act on complaints under the Safe Spaces Act (RA 11313, Section 32). Do not pay or send anything to buy time; see the sextortion first-steps guide.
- The person shown is, or is made to appear, under 18: do not download, screenshot, save or forward the material. Possessing or accessing it is itself an offence, and the law covers computer-generated images of a person made to appear to be a child (RA 11930, Sections 3(a) and 4(r)–(s)). Give the link and the account name to the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group or the NBI. Reporting to government authorities is protected by the law’s safe-harbor clause (Section 8).
Rule, exception, evidence, timing and next step
The five points below summarise the position. Citations for each are in the sections that follow.
| Question | Short answer |
|---|---|
| Main rule | Sharing sexual photos, voice or video of someone without consent, or impersonating them online, is gender-based online sexual harassment under RA 11313, Section 12. |
| Main exception | No deepfake-specific law exists yet. The right offence depends on age, relationship, threats and whether a real intimate image was used. |
| Evidence | Save links, account details, dates and threats. You rarely need extra copies of the image itself, and for a child you must not make any. |
| Timing | Section 12 offences do not prescribe, but platforms keep account data for limited periods, so report within days, not months. |
| Next step | Report to the platform, then file with PNP-ACG, NBI or CICC 1326. Go to the NPC if a site, app or company misused your likeness. |
The table above is a summary. The law-by-law detail, evidence steps and reporting routes follow below.
Key takeaways
- No Philippine “deepfake law” had been enacted as of 1 October 2026; bills are pending (see Deepfakes and Your Likeness for their status). Remedies come from existing statutes.
- The Safe Spaces Act expressly covers sharing, without consent, “any form of media that contains photos, voice, or video with sexual content” and “impersonating identities of victims online.”
- RA 11930 names “the use of artificial intelligence to construct ‘deepfake’ pornographic videos” as image-based sexual abuse where a child is involved.
- Preserve context, not copies: links, account identifiers, timestamps and threats prove the case without spreading the image further.
- Takedown and prosecution are separate tracks. Pursue both; neither is guaranteed.
Which laws may apply
Each statute has its own elements, so match the situation before choosing a route. These are binding Philippine statutes; the NPC notice cited below is regulator guidance.
| Situation | Law that may apply | What decides it |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual deepfake or voice clone of an adult is posted or sent around | RA 11313, Section 12 (gender-based online sexual harassment) | Online conduct aimed at you; sharing sexual media or impersonating you without consent |
| A real intimate photo or video was used, copied or shared | RA 9995, Section 4(b)–(d) | Real coverage of a sexual act or private area; consent to recording does not excuse sharing |
| Person shown is, or is made to look, under 18 | RA 11930, Sections 3 and 4 | Consent is irrelevant; creating, sharing, possessing and accessing are all punished |
| Made or shared by a woman’s husband, ex or dating partner | RA 9262, Section 5(h)–(i) | The relationship, and conduct causing emotional distress, public ridicule or humiliation |
| A site, app or company processed your face or voice | RA 10173, Section 25; NPC notice of 11 August 2026 | Processing without lawful basis; purely personal or household use falls outside the controller definition |
| Fake account in your name, or voice-clone scam calls | RA 10175, Sections 4(b)(3) and 6 | Use of your identifying information without right; crimes done through ICT carry a penalty one degree higher |
Safe Spaces Act. Section 12 of RA 11313 defines gender-based online sexual harassment to include “uploading and sharing without the consent of the victim, any form of media that contains photos, voice, or video with sexual content,” “impersonating identities of victims online or posting lies about victims to harm their reputation,” and online threats. Because it names voice and does not require a real photograph, it is often the closest fit for a fabricated sexual image or audio clip. Section 14 sets the penalty at prision correccional in its medium period, a fine of ₱100,000 to ₱500,000, or both, and Section 15(b) raises it one degree where the victim is a minor. Section 13 makes the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group responsible for receiving these complaints. See the Safe Spaces Act guide.
Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act. RA 9995 punishes taking photo or video coverage of a sexual act or a person’s private area without consent, and copying, selling, distributing, publishing or showing it. The closing sentence of Section 4 applies the copying and sharing bans “notwithstanding that consent to record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given.” Section 5 provides three to seven years’ imprisonment, a fine of ₱100,000 to ₱500,000, or both. The text is framed around real photo or video coverage of a person, so it fits most clearly where a genuine intimate image was used or altered. Whether it reaches an image that is entirely generated is not clear from the text, and complaints in that situation usually also rely on RA 11313. See the RA 9995 guide.
Child victims. RA 11930 treats “computer-generated, digitally or manually crafted images, or graphics of a person who is represented or who is made to appear to be a child” as covering a child (Section 3(a)), and defines image-based sexual abuse to include AI-made “deepfake” pornographic videos (Section 3(j)). Consent is not a defence (Section 5). Once a competent authority notifies a platform, the platform must block or take the content down within 24 hours (Section 9(a)(3)). See the OSAEC and CSAEM Act guide.
Partner or ex-partner. Where the victim is a woman (or her child) and the offender is her husband, former husband, a person with whom she has or had a sexual or dating relationship, or a person with whom she has a common child, RA 9262 may apply. Section 5(h) covers conduct that causes substantial emotional or psychological distress, including “any form of harassment,” and Section 5(i) covers causing “mental or emotional anguish, public ridicule or humiliation.” The penalty is prision mayor plus a fine of ₱100,000 to ₱300,000 (Section 6). A court protection order can prohibit the respondent from harassing or contacting her (Section 8(b)). A barangay protection order covers only physical harm and threats of it (Section 14), so for online abuse a temporary or permanent protection order from the court is usually the route.
Data Privacy Act. The National Privacy Commission’s notice of 11 August 2026 states that a person’s face and likeness are personal information, that generating AI images from a real person’s face is processing of personal data, and that doing so without a lawful basis may amount to unauthorized processing under Section 25 of RA 10173. The NPC says an affected person may demand removal and file a complaint, and that it may issue cease-and-desist orders. One limit: the Act’s definition of a personal information controller excludes an individual acting for personal, family or household affairs (Section 3(h)), so the NPC route is strongest against sites, apps and organisations.
Cybercrime Prevention Act. Under RA 10175, using someone’s identifying information without right is computer-related identity theft (Section 4(b)(3)), and crimes under the Revised Penal Code and special laws committed through ICT carry a penalty one degree higher (Section 6). Section 10 assigns enforcement to the NBI and the PNP. Section 13 requires service providers to preserve traffic data and subscriber information for at least six months, and content data for six months from a law-enforcement preservation order.
Preserve evidence without re-sharing it
Your goal is to prove who posted what, where and when, without giving the content a larger audience. For adults, record the following:
- The link to every post, the account name, the profile link or numeric ID, the platform, and the date and time you saw it.
- A screenshot or screen recording of the page showing the account, caption, comments and share count. You do not need to capture the intimate image at full view.
- Threats, demands and admissions in their original thread, plus the platform’s own chat export if it offers one.
- Any file sent directly to you, left where it is. Do not forward it, re-upload it or send it to friends “to check.”
- For a voice clone: the audio message or call log, the number or account used, and any payment request.
- Platform report reference numbers, takedown replies and links to re-uploads, with a short dated timeline.
If the person shown is or appears to be under 18, record only the link and the account; capture nothing else. Investigators can obtain the files from the platform through preservation orders and court-warranted disclosure orders (RA 10175, Sections 13 and 14). For a full list, use the electronic evidence checklist; to show that an image or clip is fabricated, see how to prove a deepfake is fake.
How to get it taken down
- Report it on the platform under non-consensual intimate imagery, impersonation or synthetic media rather than spam, and save the reference number.
- Adults: use StopNCII.org. Its FAQ says that if a deepfake or synthetic image is of you, you have access to it and it is nude or semi-nude, you can hash it. The hash is made on your device and the image is not uploaded. Only participating platforms act on it (StopNCII FAQ).
- Images of you when under 18: use Take It Down, run by the US National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. It also works from a hash that stays on your device (Take It Down).
- Demand removal from whoever posted it and, where a site, app or organisation is involved, complain to the NPC, which says it may issue cease-and-desist orders (NPC notice).
- Child content: report it to PNP-ACG or the NBI. Once a competent authority notifies the platform, the 24-hour takedown duty under RA 11930, Section 9(a)(3) applies.
No route guarantees removal from the whole internet. Re-uploads need fresh reports, so keep your reference numbers together.
Where to report
You can use more than one route. Bring a valid ID, your timeline, the links and your platform report numbers to each.
| Route | Use it when | Basis or source |
|---|---|---|
| PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group | Any sexual deepfake, voice clone, threat or impersonation; it receives gender-based online sexual harassment complaints | RA 11313, Section 13 |
| Police station women and children’s desk | You want to report locally or need urgent protection | RA 11313, Section 32 |
| NBI Cybercrime Division | You prefer the NBI, or the offender is hard to identify | RA 10175, Section 10 |
| CICC Hotline 1326 | Quick reports of scams and deepfakes, including voice-clone fraud | PIA, 20 March 2025 |
| National Privacy Commission | A site, app or company misused your face or voice; file a notarized complaint in person, by courier or by email | NPC complaint page |
| Family Court or other trial court | The abuser is a current or former partner and you need a protection order | RA 9262, Sections 8 to 10 |
| PNP-ACG or NBI for child victims | The person shown is, or is made to look, under 18; give the link and account only | RA 11930, Sections 4 and 9 |
For contact details and which agency handles what, see the cybercrime reporting directory and the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group complaint process.
What to do next
- Today: deal with safety first. If a child is shown, go straight to PNP-ACG or the NBI with the link only.
- Record the links, accounts, dates and threats as described above, before anything is deleted.
- Report the content to the platform, and use StopNCII.org or Take It Down if you qualify.
- Change passwords, turn on two-factor authentication, and warn family and close contacts that calls or messages in your voice may be fake. Agreeing a private check question with family is a sensible precaution.
- File a complaint with PNP-ACG, the NBI or a police women and children’s desk, and ask the investigator to send a preservation order to the platform early.
- If the abuser is a current or former partner, ask the court for a protection order under RA 9262. If a site, app or company processed your likeness, file with the NPC.
- See a lawyer, or the Public Attorney’s Office if you qualify, before filing a criminal complaint or a claim for damages.
Deadlines. Offences under Section 12 of the Safe Spaces Act are imprescriptible (RA 11313, Section 36(d)), and RA 9262 offences under Section 5(g) to 5(i) prescribe in ten years (Section 24). We did not verify one fixed period for the other offences above. In practice the deadline that matters most is data retention: platforms and providers keep account records for limited periods, so report within days.
When your voice is cloned
Sexual audio made with a cloned voice and shared without consent falls within the words of RA 11313, Section 12, which names “voice” expressly. A cloned voice used to call relatives for money is a different problem: treat it as identity theft and fraud, warn contacts, keep the call logs and payment details, and report to CICC 1326 or PNP-ACG. See AI voice cloning legal risks.
Common mistakes
- Publicly reposting the content to prove it exists or to call out the poster.
- Saving or forwarding material that shows a child, even to report it.
- Paying an extortionist or sending more images to buy time.
- Blocking or deleting the account before recording links and messages.
- Claiming every deepfake falls under one statute regardless of its elements.
- Editing screenshots so heavily that authenticity and context are lost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a deepfake law in the Philippines?
Not yet. No deepfake-specific statute had been enacted as of 1 October 2026; bills are pending in Congress. Victims rely on existing laws, chiefly the Safe Spaces Act, RA 9995, RA 11930 for children, RA 9262 for partner abuse, the Data Privacy Act and the Cybercrime Prevention Act.
Is a sexual deepfake illegal if no real nude image was used?
It can be. Sharing it without consent, or using it to impersonate you, can be gender-based online sexual harassment under RA 11313, Section 12, which covers media with sexual content and online impersonation. RA 9995 fits best when a real intimate image was used. If the image shows or is made to look like a child, RA 11930 applies even though it is computer-generated.
Can I demand that a platform remove it?
You can report it and ask for removal; whether and how fast it comes down depends on the platform’s own rules. Use the most specific report category, give exact links, and add a StopNCII.org or Take It Down hash. For child content, a notice from a competent authority triggers a 24-hour takedown duty under RA 11930. Persistent re-uploads may need a criminal complaint or court process.
Should I keep a copy of the deepfake as evidence?
If you are an adult, keep anything that was sent to you where it is, and record links, accounts and context. Do not make or share extra copies. If the person shown is or looks under 18, do not save it at all; report the link to PNP-ACG or the NBI.
What if the voice clone is used to scam my family?
Warn your contacts immediately, keep the call logs, messages and payment details, and report to CICC Hotline 1326 or PNP-ACG. Treat it as impersonation and fraud, including computer-related identity theft under RA 10175, Section 4(b)(3), and not only as a likeness issue.
What if my ex-partner made or shared it?
If you are a woman and the person is your husband, former husband, or a current or former sexual or dating partner, RA 9262 may apply in addition to the Safe Spaces Act. You can ask the court for a temporary or permanent protection order that bars that person from harassing or contacting you.
Related Cybercode guides
- Deepfakes and Your Likeness
- Digital Likeness Rights Philippines
- AI Voice Cloning Legal Risks
- Sextortion: What Victims Should Do First
- Cybercrime Reporting Directory
Official sources
- Republic Act No. 11313 — Safe Spaces Act (Official Gazette)
- Republic Act No. 9995 — Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (Supreme Court E-Library)
- Republic Act No. 11930 — Anti-OSAEC and Anti-CSAEM Act (Supreme Court E-Library)
- Republic Act No. 9262 — Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act (Official Gazette)
- Republic Act No. 10173 — Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Official Gazette)
- Republic Act No. 10175 — Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Official Gazette)
- National Privacy Commission — Notice on real persons’ likenesses in AI-generated images (11 August 2026)
- National Privacy Commission — Filing formal complaints
- Philippine Information Agency — CICC and PCO launch Hotline 1326 (20 March 2025)
- StopNCII.org — FAQ · Take It Down (NCMEC)
Sources rechecked as of: 2026-10-01
Important: This article provides general educational information about Philippine law, regulation, cybersecurity, technology, or business compliance. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws, agency procedures, technical standards, platform rules, and the facts of each situation may change the result. Verify current requirements through the cited official sources and seek qualified professional advice when your rights, deadlines, money, safety, or legal exposure may be affected.

